[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] net: introduce a list of device addresses dev_addr_list
Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:13:57PM CEST, wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
>> From: Eric Dumazet <>
>> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:27:50 +0200
>>> Since you obviously need a write lock here to be sure following
>>> can be done by one cpu only.
>>> You have same problem all over this patch.
>> RTNL semaphore is held across all modification operations.
> If this will also be used for multicast lists, changes can happen
> (IPv6) without the RTNL.

Ok, but for dev_addr_X() functions the RTNL mutex is sufficient so I see no
point of adding another lock here. When the multicast handling functions will be
implemented to use netdev_hw_addr and it's layer, then we need to use update
lock in dev_multicast_X.

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-15 16:47    [W:0.139 / U:1.164 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site