Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:33:12 -0400 (EDT) | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/8] [GIT PULL] TRACE_EVENT for modules |
| |
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote: > > > include/trace/define_trace.h | 79 ++++++ > > include/trace/ftrace.h | 493 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > include/trace/irq.h | 56 ++++- > > include/trace/irq_event_types.h | 55 ---- > > include/trace/kmem.h | 189 +++++++++++++- > > include/trace/lockdep.h | 55 ++++- > > include/trace/lockdep_event_types.h | 57 ---- > > include/trace/sched.h | 336 +++++++++++++++++++++++- > > include/trace/sched_event_types.h | 337 ------------------------ > > include/trace/skb.h | 39 +++- > > include/trace/skb_event_types.h | 38 --- > > include/trace/trace_event_types.h | 7 - > > include/trace/trace_events.h | 7 - > > Detail: we still have include/trace/kmem_event_types.h around - is > that intentional? It isnt actually used by anything so we can git-rm > it.
I rebased it several times, doing minor tweaks and such. I think I may have missed a git-rm. That file is suppose to be deleted.
> > Also, we mix tracepoint definition headers with other misc headers > such as syscall.h or boot.h. > > I think it would be cleaner and better sructured to have these > centrally enumerated tracepoint definitions separated in > include/trace/events/. > > That sub-directory would _only_ include the TRACE_EVENT() > definitions - nothing else. Hence it would also be a nice in-situ > template collection for anyone adding new tracepoints. The existence > of other headers really distracts from that. > > What do you think?
I'm fine with that. As long as people are fine with doing:
#include <trace/events/sched.h>
and such.
-- Steve
| |