Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:32:52 +0200 | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 1/6] mm: Don't unmap gup()ed page |
| |
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:26:34AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > Andrea: I didn't veto that set_bit change of yours as such. I just
I know you didn't ;)
> noted there could be more atomic operations. Actually I would > welcome more comparison between our two approaches, but they seem
Agree about the welcome of comparison, it'd be nice to measure it the enterprise workloads that showed the gup_fast gain in the first place.
| |