Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:07:31 +0200 | From | Tomasz Chmielewski <> | Subject | Re: [Scst-devel] [ANNOUNCE]: Comparison of features sets between different SCSI targets (SCST, STGT, IET, LIO) |
| |
Vladislav Bolkhovitin schrieb:
>> Could anyone recheck if it's the same on some other system? >> >>> Which IO scheduler on the target did you use? I guess, deadline? If >>> so, you should try with CFQ as well. >> >> I used CFQ. > > You didn't apply io_context-XXX.patch, correct? With it you should see a > noticeable increase, like in http://scst.sourceforge.net/vl_res.txt.
I didn't apply this one.
I used 2.6.26.x kernel and io_context-XXX.patch was for 2.6.27, 2.6.28 and 2.6.29 only; 2.6.27 fails to apply to 2.6.26.8 kernel (perhaps in a trivial way, I didn't check).
-- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org
| |