lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: High latency on /sys/class/thermal
Bad news, 

The current kernel does not resume from S3, and using tuxonice, it does
not eve enter in S3 :( no go here.

Attached is the dmesg from a vanilla (up to date as of this morning)
kernel.

The important lines are
[ 148.393165] ACPI: Execute Method [\_TZ_.THRM._TMP] (Node f7017378)
[ 157.648543] thermal-0263 [00] thermal_get_temperatur: Temperature is 3212 dK

but I do not think it adds any more detail, sorry


On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:44:14 +0800
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 11:28 +0800, Tiago Simões Batista wrote:
> > dmesg attached
> >
> > This is a new, the maximum latency I got with debug enabled was
> > little over 3 seconds.... For a while I was worried that debugging
> > actually masked the problem!
> >
> 3 seconds is still abnormal.
> It's weird that there is no debug info that I want.
> please add the boot parameter "log_buf_len=1048576" this time and redo
> the test both before and after a S3 cycle.
>
> thanks,
> rui
>
>
> > On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:02:51 +0800
> > Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > CC Alexey because this is EC related.
> > > The high letancy is probably spent on accessing the EC address
> > > space in _TMP method.
> > >
> > > Tiago,
> > > please make sure your kernel is built with CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG set
> > > and then
> > > 1. boot with printk.time=1 acpi.debug_level=0x07
> > > acpi.debug_layer=0x04000018
> > > 2. run cat /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp
> > > 3. attach the full dmesg output.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > rui
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 10:28 +0800, Tiago Simões Batista wrote:
> > > > acpidump output attached.
> > > >
> > > > I found no latency on battery iterface, included is another
> > > > poke at the thermal zone for comparison.
> > > >
> > > > This problem is still present, but at the moment, I shut down
> > > > the sensors-applet on the gnome panel, so that it no longer
> > > > makes gnome-panel stall.
> > > >
> > > > $ time cat /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp
> > > > 49000
> > > >
> > > > real 0m13.476s
> > > > user 0m0.001s
> > > > sys 0m0.001s
> > > > $ time cat /sys/class/power_supply/BAT0/*
> > > > 0
> > > > 29
> > > > 0
> > > > 0
> > > > cat: /sys/class/power_supply/BAT0/device: Is a directory
> > > > 582640000
> > > > 65120000
> > > > 18710000
> > > > SMP-SONY
> > > > 04ZL
> > > > cat: /sys/class/power_supply/BAT0/power: Is a directory
> > > > 0
> > > > 0
> > > > 1
> > > > Full
> > > > cat: /sys/class/power_supply/BAT0/subsystem: Is a directory
> > > > Li-ion
> > > > 270
> > > > Battery
> > > > PHYSDEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/device:00/PNP0A03:00/device:0b/PNP0C09:00/ACPI0001:00/ACPI0002:00
> > > > PHYSDEVBUS=acpi
> > > > PHYSDEVDRIVER=sbs
> > > > POWER_SUPPLY_NAME=BAT0
> > > > POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE=Battery
> > > > POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS=Full
> > > > POWER_SUPPLY_PRESENT=1
> > > > POWER_SUPPLY_TECHNOLOGY=Li-ion
> > > > POWER_SUPPLY_VOLTAGE_MIN_DESIGN=14800000
> > > > POWER_SUPPLY_VOLTAGE_NOW=15611000
> > > > POWER_SUPPLY_CURRENT_NOW=0
> > > > POWER_SUPPLY_CURRENT_AVG=0
> > > > POWER_SUPPLY_POWER_NOW=0
> > > > POWER_SUPPLY_POWER_AVG=0
> > > > POWER_SUPPLY_CAPACITY=29
> > > > POWER_SUPPLY_ENERGY_FULL_DESIGN=65120000
> > > > POWER_SUPPLY_ENERGY_FULL=582640000
> > > > POWER_SUPPLY_ENERGY_NOW=18710000
> > > > POWER_SUPPLY_TEMP=270
> > > > POWER_SUPPLY_MODEL_NAME=04ZL
> > > > POWER_SUPPLY_MANUFACTURER=SMP-SONY
> > > > 14800000
> > > > 15611000
> > > >
> > > > real 0m0.110s
> > > > user 0m0.001s
> > > > sys 0m0.004s
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:43:42 +0800
> > > > Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > this sounds like an EC problem to me. please attach the
> > > > > acpidump output. is there a long latency when you poke other
> > > > > ACPI devices, say battery?
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks,
> > > > > rui
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 00:03 +0800, Tiago Simões Batista wrote:
> > > > > > On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 23:16:11 +0100
> > > > > > Tiago Simões Batista <tiagosbatista@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sorry about the noise, by brain was stopped when I sent
> > > > > > > the last mail, please ignore the From address, it is
> > > > > > > wrong!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:14:16 -0700
> > > > > > > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > (cc linux-acpi)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 15:56:12 +0100 "Tiago Sim__es
> > > > > > > > Batista" <tiagosbatista@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi all
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Yesterday, I recompiled my kernel (git + tuxonice)
> > > > > > > > > v2.6.30-rc1-1002-gac91f91, there were a couple of
> > > > > > > > > issues, the main one is ilustrated bellow.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I am not familiar with the kernel code, but if you
> > > > > > > > > give me some pointers, I will be glad to investigate
> > > > > > > > > this further
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > $time cat /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp
> > > > > > > > > 34000
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > real 0m6.613s
> > > > > > > > > user 0m0.000s
> > > > > > > > > sys 0m0.001s
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Is this a regression? Was 2.6.29 OK?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My last kernel was fine:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > $ time cat /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp
> > > > > > > 48000
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > real 0m0.007s
> > > > > > > user 0m0.001s
> > > > > > > sys 0m0.007s
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I also forgot to add some information about my kernels...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The good one is 2.6.29 + tuxonice as it was the day after
> > > > > > > the 2.6.29 kernel was released.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The bad one is a pull from linus tree on april the 9th
> > > > > > > plus tuxonice on the same day
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > from git (hope this helps):
> > > > > > > $ git describe v2.6.29-tiago2-ice
> > > > > > > v2.6.29-836-g00492ed
> > > > > > > $ git describe v2.6.30-rc1-tiago1-ice
> > > > > > > v2.6.30-rc1-1002-gac91f91
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If tuxonice is a suspect, I will be glad to remove it and
> > > > > > > recompile. If I have the time later this weekend, and
> > > > > > > nothing was found, I will try to bisect this.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here are some results from the bisect:
> > > > > > The metric I used to mark a revision as good/bad was
> > > > > > $ time for ((i =0; i < 100; i++)); do
> > > > > > cat /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp
> > > > > > > /dev/null; done
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The bad ones take forever, i never even finished one bad
> > > > > > run. The good ones take about half a second.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When I checked out revisions v2.6.29-148-g33526a5 and
> > > > > > v2.6.29-159-g8a3f257, it took almost 2 secons to run the
> > > > > > command, so I think some of the latency my have been
> > > > > > introduced around these. Yet, I still marked them as good.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The resut was:
> > > > > > 478c6a43fcbc6c11609f8cee7c7b57223907754f is first bad commit
> > > > > > witch is a merge. I am out of ideas...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I forgot to ask, am I the only one experiencing this? I am
> > > > > > using a TravelMate 4000 with the intel graphics chip, can
> > > > > > anyone reproduce this? If no one can reproduce this, I can
> > > > > > still test a vanilla kernel to remove TOI from the equation!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tiago
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Below is the bisect log:
> > > > > > $ git bisect log
> > > > > > git bisect start
> > > > > > # bad: [ac91f917d7ed7d1ebe14532ee137fcd759b4406d] Merge
> > > > > > branch 'all' into all-tuxonice git bisect bad
> > > > > > ac91f917d7ed7d1ebe14532ee137fcd759b4406d # good:
> > > > > > [178a426510a901d9335f39d3391ae5e8628a36d1] Merge branch
> > > > > > 'tuxonice' into all-tuxonice git bisect good
> > > > > > 178a426510a901d9335f39d3391ae5e8628a36d1 # good:
> > > > > > [fdf9c9979a355916433262ea5e5e64bed5def86e] V4L/DVB (10465):
> > > > > > dsbr100: Add few lost mutex locks. git bisect good
> > > > > > fdf9c9979a355916433262ea5e5e64bed5def86e # good:
> > > > > > [edbd606c4671fcd439164c8d63e896044d706156] Staging: wlan-ng:
> > > > > > Replace WLAN_LOG_ERROR() with printk() git bisect good
> > > > > > edbd606c4671fcd439164c8d63e896044d706156 # good:
> > > > > > [3516c6a8dc0b1153c611c4cf0dc4a51631f052bb] Merge
> > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging-2.6
> > > > > > git bisect good 3516c6a8dc0b1153c611c4cf0dc4a51631f052bb #
> > > > > > bad: [3989203290fba6fdf6bc4825fbf6526e1bf17977] Merge
> > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6
> > > > > > git bisect bad 3989203290fba6fdf6bc4825fbf6526e1bf17977 #
> > > > > > bad: [d7ca6f8cdffa5765e486edb3dada9121fba8e6aa] Merge branch
> > > > > > 'for-linus' of git://git.o-hand.com/linux-rpurdie-backlight
> > > > > > git bisect bad d7ca6f8cdffa5765e486edb3dada9121fba8e6aa #
> > > > > > good: [3b4dadf05d177289c279c50030c7c75e004952bb] Merge
> > > > > > branch 'acpi_enforce_resources' into release git bisect good
> > > > > > 3b4dadf05d177289c279c50030c7c75e004952bb # bad:
> > > > > > [32fb6c17566ec66de87324a834c7776f40e35e78] Merge branch
> > > > > > 'release' of
> > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6
> > > > > > git bisect bad 32fb6c17566ec66de87324a834c7776f40e35e78 #
> > > > > > good: [45e36c1666aa6c8b0c538abcf984b336184d8c3f] Merge
> > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lethal/sh-2.6
> > > > > > git bisect good 45e36c1666aa6c8b0c538abcf984b336184d8c3f #
> > > > > > good: [33526a53600ac887d100e3c9b4be3637ac8ae3a5] Merge
> > > > > > branch 'x2apic' into release git bisect good
> > > > > > 33526a53600ac887d100e3c9b4be3637ac8ae3a5 # good:
> > > > > > [c542aadeb4700bc316834d862d52ba3d2664f13a]
> > > > > > panasonic-laptop: Fix autoloading git bisect good
> > > > > > c542aadeb4700bc316834d862d52ba3d2664f13a # bad:
> > > > > > [478c6a43fcbc6c11609f8cee7c7b57223907754f] Merge branch
> > > > > > 'linus' into release git bisect bad
> > > > > > 478c6a43fcbc6c11609f8cee7c7b57223907754f # good:
> > > > > > [15065531c1c5902775ae3ade24eb37d0e688353b] toshiba-acpi:
> > > > > > remove MAINTAINERS entry git bisect good
> > > > > > 15065531c1c5902775ae3ade24eb37d0e688353b # good:
> > > > > > [8a3f257c704e02aee9869decd069a806b45be3f1] Merge branch
> > > > > > 'misc' into release git bisect good
> > > > > > 8a3f257c704e02aee9869decd069a806b45be3f1
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

[unhandled content-type:application/octet-stream]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-13 17:07    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans