Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 12 Apr 2009 19:15:42 +0300 | From | Avi Kivity <> | Subject | Re: Implementing NVMHCI... |
| |
Alan Cox wrote: >> The atomic building units (sector size, block size, etc) of NTFS are >> entirely parametric. The maximum values could be bigger than the >> currently "configured" maximum limits. >> > > That isn't what bites you - you can run 8K-32K ext2 file systems but if > your physical page size is smaller than the fs page size you have a > problem. > > The question is whether the NT VM can cope rather than the fs. >
A quick test shows that it can. I didn't try mmap(), but copying files around worked.
Did you expect it not to work?
-- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
| |