lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 13 Apr 2009 08:43:00 +0800
FromLi Zefan <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] blktrace: fix output of BLK_TC_PC events
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 12 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> * Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Ingo,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to ask what's the status of these 2 patches.
>>>>
>>>> Arnaldo acked on them.
>>> They looked good to me - but i'm waiting for an Ack from Jens. Jens
>>> has complained about seeing un-ack-ed patches in the blktrace code,
>>> so i've started serializing any new patches on acks from Jens. The
>>> workflow would be more efficient i suspect if Jens
>>> nominated/declared you and Arnaldo as blktrace co-maintainers too -
>>> most of the patches come from you two.
>> I'd be fine with listing Li Zefan as co-maintainer of the blktrace
>> bits. He knows what he is doing and is also a user of blktrace, so
>> I think he would be fine. Li, what do you think?
>
> Cool ... i've also taken this as an implicit approval from you of Li
> sending blktrace patches so i have queued the two up.
>

Thanks!

> The next big (and nice!) step would be the blktrace events in
> TRACE_EVENT() style. That would integrate the blktrace tracepoints
> with all the others, in one coherent framework.
>

As I mentioned in another mail thread, this is what we are planning
to do. :)

--
Zefan


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-13 02:45    [from the cache]
©2003-2010