lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: tiobench read 50% regression with 2.6.30-rc1
On Fri, Apr 10 2009, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 11:57 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 09 2009, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> > > Comparing with 2.6.29's result, tiobench (read) has about 50% regression
> > > with 2.6.30-rc1 on all my machines. Bisect down to below patch.
> > >
> > > b029195dda0129b427c6e579a3bb3ae752da3a93 is first bad commit
> > > commit b029195dda0129b427c6e579a3bb3ae752da3a93
> > > Author: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
> > > Date: Tue Apr 7 11:38:31 2009 +0200
> > >
> > > cfq-iosched: don't let idling interfere with plugging
> > >
> > > When CFQ is waiting for a new request from a process, currently it'll
> > > immediately restart queuing when it sees such a request. This doesn't
> > > work very well with streamed IO, since we then end up splitting IO
> > > that would otherwise have been merged nicely. For a simple dd test,
> > > this causes 10x as many requests to be issued as we should have.
> > > Normally this goes unnoticed due to the low overhead of requests
> > > at the device side, but some hardware is very sensitive to request
> > > sizes and there it can cause big slow downs.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Command to start the testing:
> > > #tiotest -k0 -k1 -k3 -f 80 -t 32
> > >
> > > It's a multi-threaded program and starts 32 threads. Every thread does I/O
> > > on its own 80MB file.
> The files should be created before the testing and pls. drop page caches
> by "echo 3 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches" before testing.
>
> >
> > It's not a huge surprise that we regressed there. I'll get this fixed up
> > next week. Can you I talk you into trying to change the 'quantum' sysfs
> > variable for the drive? It's in /sys/block/xxx/queue/iosched where xxx
> > is your drive(s). It's set to 4, if you could try progressively larger
> > settings and retest, that would help get things started.
> I tried 4,8,16,64,128 and didn't find result difference.

OK, that's good. I'm away from the source atm, but I think I know what
is going on. We need to kick the queue for anything but the first queued
request. I'll get it fixed up next week.

--
Jens Axboe



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-10 09:39    [W:0.116 / U:1.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site