lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Apr]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 1 Apr 2009 12:25:04 +0100 (BST)
FromHugh Dickins <>
SubjectRe: Q: check_unsafe_exec() races (Was: [PATCH 2/4] fix setuid sometimes doesn't)
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Al Viro wrote:
>
> Rebased and pushed (same tree, same branch; included into for-next, along
> with related cleanups).

for-next? But don't we need all this (or at least the first four of
your five, on top of the four Linus took from me) in -stable now?

I was wondering if we should ask Chris to do a 2.6.29.1-rc2 with
them; but perhaps you'd much rather expose them in -next for a
while, before sending Linus and 2.6.29.2.

Hugh


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-01 13:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2010