Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:25:04 +0100 (BST) | | From | Hugh Dickins <> | | Subject | Re: Q: check_unsafe_exec() races (Was: [PATCH 2/4] fix setuid sometimes doesn't) |
| |
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Al Viro wrote: > > Rebased and pushed (same tree, same branch; included into for-next, along > with related cleanups).
for-next? But don't we need all this (or at least the first four of your five, on top of the four Linus took from me) in -stable now?
I was wondering if we should ask Chris to do a 2.6.29.1-rc2 with them; but perhaps you'd much rather expose them in -next for a while, before sending Linus and 2.6.29.2.
Hugh
|  |