Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Mon, 9 Mar 2009 10:58:07 -0600 | | From | Matthew Wilcox <> | | Subject | Re: kobj refcounting weirdness |
| |
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 10:50:10AM -0600, Alex Chiang wrote: > I thought about the allocators returning a pointer to the same > location that maybe has some valid looking data hanging around, > but it's not wise for someone like me to go pointing fingers at > the allocator before I've proven the bug isn't in my code. ;)
Slab poisoning would be the logical next thing to try to decide whether the allocator is wrong or you're using it wrong ;-)
-- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."
|  |