Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch] Re: scheduler oddity [bug?] | From | Mike Galbraith <> | Date | Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:16:03 +0100 |
| |
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 12:04 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> OK, talked a bit with Ingo, the reason you're doing is that avg_overlap > can easily grow stale.. I can see that happen indeed. > > So the 'perfect' thing would be a task-runtime decay, barring that the > preemption thing seems a sane enough hart-beat of a task. > > How does the below look to you?
Other than the fact that the test for sync reject is currently avg_overlap > sysctl_sched_migration_cost, looks fine to me. Having it capped at the boundary is probably the better way to go.
-Mike
| |