lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: replace() system call needed (was Re: EXT4-ish "fixes" in UBIFS)
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:27:33PM +0200, Bodo Eggert wrote:
> This can be done using implicit logic:
>
> ->E.g. on close(), mark inodes without being sync()ed as poisoned.
> (I can think of more sophisticated logic, but ...)
> ->On completing the inode with the delayed allocations, unpoison it.
> ->Don't commit rename()s if the corresponding inode is poisoned.

Send us patches if you think it's that easy to do what you are
proposing. I assure it's not easy.

- Ted


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-04-01 02:09    [W:5.160 / U:1.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site