lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Linux 2.6.29
    > It seems you still didn't get the point. ext3 data=ordered is not the
    > problem. The problem is that the average developer doesn't expect the fs
    > to _re-order_ stuff. This is how most common fs did work long before

    No it isn´t. Standard Unix file systems made no such guarantee and would
    write out data out of order. The disk scheduler would then further
    re-order things.

    If you think the ¨guarantees¨ from before ext3 are normal defaults you´ve
    been writing junk code

    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-03-30 11:39    [W:0.022 / U:29.628 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site