Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 29 Mar 2009 13:46:57 +0200 (CEST) | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: [git-pull -tip] x86: include inverse Xmas tree patches |
| |
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 00:40 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> wrote: > > > > > > Please find a better use for your time. > > > > > > Imagine, there might be developers out there with real work > > > to do in these files: all you are doing is throwing silly > > > little obstacles in their way. > > > > Actually, now is the right time to do such changes as we've just > > pushed all pending x86 changes upstream. And since these changes > > reduce the chance of future patch conflicts, they do help > > development. (in a small way) > > > > Nevertheless i'd suggest to make this a single commit, to not > > clobber the shortlog with it. > > > > I think individual patches will be better option, in case of unavoidable > situation we can simply revert that particular patch.
What unavoidable situation ? That you broke stuff with your changes ? If you are so unsure about the quality of your changes, then the best option is to not pull that stuff at all.
Thanks,
tglx
| |