Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 30 Mar 2009 03:17:25 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] blktrace: last round of fixes |
| |
* Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > > This is the last round of fixes for blktrace, I hope. :) > > > > > > Changelog v1 -> v2: > > > - fix a bug in "blktrace: make classic output more classic", > > > and rebase other patches. > > > - re-order patches. > > > - a new patch for filtering BLK_TN_MESSAGE > > > > > > [PATCH v2 1/6] trace: make 'mem' argument of trace_seq_putmem() const > > > [PATCH v2 2/6] blktrace: make classic output more classic > > > [PATCH v2 3/6] blktrace: fix blk_probes_ref chaos > > > [PATCH v2 4/6] blktrace: fix memory leak when freeing struct blk_io_trace > > > [PATCH v2 5/6] blktrace: extract duplidate code > > > [PATCH v2 6/6] blktrace: print out BLK_TN_MESSAGE properly > > > --- > > > blktrace.c | 188 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ > > > trace_output.c | 6 - > > > trace_output.h | 5 - > > > 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-) > > > > Li, Jens - what's your call for v2.6.30, can the blktrace changes go > > upstream or should i zap the whole thing? > > > > There are no new -tip test failures here so it's green as far as i'm > > concerned. It's holding up the tracing tree so we need to decide one > > way or another. > > If Li deems it ready, then it has my blessing as well.
thanks Jens - i have added your Acked-by's as well.
Ingo
| |