[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [git-pull -tip] x86: include inverse Xmas tree patches
    Sam Ravnborg wrote:
    > Ordering include based on length of line minimize the
    > risk of merge conflicts.
    > If people just add new includes in the bottom of the list you
    > are certain that a merge conflit happens.
    > This scheme is starting to be used in several places with the
    > primary advocates being David Miller and Ingo.
    > It is getting used both for includes _and_ for local variables.

    Personally I'd prefer alphabetic order, sorting based on length isn't a
    complete ordering. Nearly all editors can sort alphabetically at the
    push of a key.


     \ /
      Last update: 2009-03-28 23:29    [W:0.025 / U:11.176 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site