[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [git-pull -tip] x86: include inverse Xmas tree patches
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Ordering include based on length of line minimize the
> risk of merge conflicts.
> If people just add new includes in the bottom of the list you
> are certain that a merge conflit happens.
> This scheme is starting to be used in several places with the
> primary advocates being David Miller and Ingo.
> It is getting used both for includes _and_ for local variables.

Personally I'd prefer alphabetic order, sorting based on length isn't a
complete ordering. Nearly all editors can sort alphabetically at the
push of a key.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-03-28 23:29    [W:0.085 / U:2.292 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site