[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] Ext3 latency improvement patches
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Jeff Garzik <> wrote:
> Theodore Tso wrote:
>> OTOH, the really big databases will tend to use direct I/O, so they
>> won't be dirtying the page cache anyway.  So maybe it's not worth the
> Not necessarily...  From what I understand, a lot of the individual
> low-level components in cloud storage, such as GoogleFS's chunk server[1] do
> not bypass the page cache, even though they do care about the details of
> data caching and data consistency.

PostgreSQL does not use direct I/O, either (except for the
write-ahead-logs which are written sequentially and only get read
during database recovery). I'm sure that most of MySQL's database
engines, also don't.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-03-28 01:27    [W:0.089 / U:16.084 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site