Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:01:51 +0100 | From | Frederic Weisbecker <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL] tracing: add handler to trace_stat |
| |
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:30:33PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Ingo, > > Please pull the latest tip/tracing/ftrace tree, which can be found at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-2.6-trace.git > tip/tracing/ftrace > > > Steven Rostedt (1): > tracing: add handler to trace_stat > > ---- > kernel/trace/trace_branch.c | 4 ++-- > kernel/trace/trace_stat.c | 2 +- > kernel/trace/trace_stat.h | 2 +- > kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > --------------------------- > commit 425480081e936d8725f0d44b8829d699bf088c6b > Author: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> > Date: Tue Mar 24 13:38:36 2009 -0400 > > tracing: add handler to trace_stat > > Currently, if a trace_stat user wants a handle to some private data, > the trace_stat infrastructure does not supply a way to do that. > > This patch passes the trace_stat structure to the start function of > the trace_stat code. > > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_branch.c b/kernel/trace/trace_branch.c > index ad8c22e..e6e3291 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_branch.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_branch.c > @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ static int branch_stat_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) > return 0; > } > > -static void *annotated_branch_stat_start(void) > +static void *annotated_branch_stat_start(struct tracer_stat *trace) > { > return __start_annotated_branch_profile; > } > @@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ static int all_branch_stat_headers(struct seq_file *m) > return 0; > } > > -static void *all_branch_stat_start(void) > +static void *all_branch_stat_start(struct tracer_stat *trace) > { > return __start_branch_profile; > } > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_stat.c b/kernel/trace/trace_stat.c > index f71b85b..f8f48d8 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_stat.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_stat.c > @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int stat_seq_init(struct tracer_stat_session *session) > if (!ts->stat_cmp) > ts->stat_cmp = dummy_cmp; > > - stat = ts->stat_start(); > + stat = ts->stat_start(ts); > if (!stat) > goto exit; > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_stat.h b/kernel/trace/trace_stat.h > index 202274c..f3546a2 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_stat.h > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_stat.h > @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ struct tracer_stat { > /* The name of your stat file */ > const char *name; > /* Iteration over statistic entries */ > - void *(*stat_start)(void); > + void *(*stat_start)(struct tracer_stat *trace);
In that case, shoudn't we pass another thing than the struct tracer_stat? Because nothing really private can be stored in it. Moreover, most of the time the handler is dedicated to this tracer_stat so it is able to have an access to it.
May be we could add a void *private inside struct trace_stat and then pass it to stat_start() ?
Thanks, Frederic.
> void *(*stat_next)(void *prev, int idx); > /* Compare two entries for stats sorting */ > int (*stat_cmp)(void *p1, void *p2); > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c b/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c > index 9ab035b..ee533c2 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c > @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static struct cpu_workqueue_stats *workqueue_stat_start_cpu(int cpu) > return ret; > } > > -static void *workqueue_stat_start(void) > +static void *workqueue_stat_start(struct tracer_stat *trace) > { > int cpu; > void *ret = NULL; >
| |