[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux 2.6.29
On Tue, Mar 24 2009, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> But I really don't understand filesystem people who think that "fsck"
>> is the important part, regardless of whether the data is valid or not.
>> That's just stupid and _obviously_ bogus.
> I think I can understand that point of view, at least:
> More customers complain about hours-long fsck times than they do about
> silent data corruption of non-fsync'd files.
>> The point is, if you write your metadata earlier (say, every 5 sec) and
>> the real data later (say, every 30 sec), you're actually MORE LIKELY to
>> see corrupt files than if you try to write them together.
>> And if you write your data _first_, you're never going to see
>> corruption at all.
> Amen.
> And, personal filesystem pet peeve: please encourage proper FLUSH CACHE
> use to give users the data guarantees they deserve. Linux's sync(2) and
> fsync(2) (and fdatasync, etc.) should poke the block layer to guarantee
> a media write.

fsync already does that, at least if you have barriers enabled on your

Jens Axboe

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-03-25 10:41    [W:0.427 / U:4.196 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site