[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Correct behaviour of irq affinity?
Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 March 2009 11:03:08 Rusty Russell wrote:
>> On Tuesday 24 March 2009 23:09:37 Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> cpu_mask_to_apic_id do not take cpu_online_map into account and should
>>> probably be fixed. flat_cpu_mask_to_apicid was the one I could find.
>> Also the numaq apic.h. I'll do an audit and send a patch.
> Actually, numaq is just weird, so I'll assume it's correct. I couldn't
> find any others.
>> Yes, agree with Yinghai's fix. I'll re-spin my patch on top of his.
> But he already did it while I slept in.

waiting for ingo to put that three into tip/master:

[PATCH 1/3] x86: fix set_extra_move_desc calling
[PATCH 2/3] x86: use default_cpu_mask_to_apicid for 64bit
[PATCH 3/3] x86: Correct behaviour of irq affinity -v2


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-03-25 02:07    [W:0.052 / U:6.576 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site