[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 0/5] Intel Poulsbo/Morrestown DRM driver and DRM core changes
Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:14:35AM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>>> First off, the non-staging patches need more complete changelog entries,
>>> a bit of meaning goes a long way. I'll ack them if they are documented and
>>> make sense. The unlocked ioctl hook makes sense to me at least!
>> For the non-staging patches, (which also sit in the modesetting-newttm
>> tree), I can add some more elaborate comments. However I think all of
>> them are targeted to support functionality for TTM, so unless the TTM
>> code goes into staging or mainstream, there is little point in merging
>> them to core drm before other drivers find them useful.
>> Although I see the patch adding TTM is including some backwards
>> compatibility defines (In particular the PAT compat stuff) that needs
>> to be stripped.
> Great, care to respin it and send it to me?
> thanks,
> greg k-h
A clean TTM patch was sent to Intel with the other patches.
I'm not sure why it got lost along the way?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-03-19 21:43    [W:0.091 / U:3.464 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site