[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 0/5] Intel Poulsbo/Morrestown DRM driver and DRM core changes
    Greg KH wrote:
    > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:14:35AM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
    >>> First off, the non-staging patches need more complete changelog entries,
    >>> a bit of meaning goes a long way. I'll ack them if they are documented and
    >>> make sense. The unlocked ioctl hook makes sense to me at least!
    >> For the non-staging patches, (which also sit in the modesetting-newttm
    >> tree), I can add some more elaborate comments. However I think all of
    >> them are targeted to support functionality for TTM, so unless the TTM
    >> code goes into staging or mainstream, there is little point in merging
    >> them to core drm before other drivers find them useful.
    >> Although I see the patch adding TTM is including some backwards
    >> compatibility defines (In particular the PAT compat stuff) that needs
    >> to be stripped.
    > Great, care to respin it and send it to me?
    > thanks,
    > greg k-h
    A clean TTM patch was sent to Intel with the other patches.
    I'm not sure why it got lost along the way?


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-03-19 21:43    [W:0.024 / U:1.440 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site