Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:40:08 +0100 | | From | Thomas Hellström <> | | Subject | Re: [patch 0/5] Intel Poulsbo/Morrestown DRM driver and DRM core changes |
Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:14:35AM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote: > >>> First off, the non-staging patches need more complete changelog entries, >>> a bit of meaning goes a long way. I'll ack them if they are documented and >>> make sense. The unlocked ioctl hook makes sense to me at least! >>> >>> >> For the non-staging patches, (which also sit in the modesetting-newttm >> tree), I can add some more elaborate comments. However I think all of >> them are targeted to support functionality for TTM, so unless the TTM >> code goes into staging or mainstream, there is little point in merging >> them to core drm before other drivers find them useful. >> >> Although I see the patch adding TTM is including some backwards >> compatibility defines (In particular the PAT compat stuff) that needs >> to be stripped. >> > > Great, care to respin it and send it to me? > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Greg, A clean TTM patch was sent to Intel with the other patches. I'm not sure why it got lost along the way?
/Thomas
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |