lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: High contention on the sk_buff_head.lock
    From
    Date
    On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 06:59 -0600, Peter W. Morreale wrote:
    > On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 21:54 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
    > > Vernon Mauery <vernux@us.ibm.com> writes:
    > > >
    >
    > >
    > > But then again I'm not sure it's worth it if the problem only
    > > happens in out of tree RT.
    > >
    >
    > Heh. That darn bastard child again, eh? :-)
    >
    >
    > Recall that adaptive spin,developed in RT, is now in mainline.
    >

    Err.. correction... *about* to be in mainline. Only point I'm making
    is that RT does implicitly, if not explicitly, contributes to mainline.
    Its not a one-way street.

    Best,
    -PWM

    > Best,
    > -PWM
    >
    >
    > --
    > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
    > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-03-19 14:39    [W:0.021 / U:0.760 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site