lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: High contention on the sk_buff_head.lock
From
Date
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 06:59 -0600, Peter W. Morreale wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 21:54 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Vernon Mauery <vernux@us.ibm.com> writes:
> > >
>
> >
> > But then again I'm not sure it's worth it if the problem only
> > happens in out of tree RT.
> >
>
> Heh. That darn bastard child again, eh? :-)
>
>
> Recall that adaptive spin,developed in RT, is now in mainline.
>

Err.. correction... *about* to be in mainline. Only point I'm making
is that RT does implicitly, if not explicitly, contributes to mainline.
Its not a one-way street.

Best,
-PWM

> Best,
> -PWM
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-03-19 14:39    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site