Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:02:33 -0700 | From | Randy Dunlap <> | Subject | Re: [stable] Linux 2.6.28.8 (ocfs2 build failure) |
| |
Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 01:26:47PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> Enable all possible OCFS2 kconfig options: >> >> >> >> In file included from fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:42: >> fs/ocfs2/journal.h: In function 'ocfs2_begin_ordered_truncate': >> fs/ocfs2/journal.h:451: warning: passing argument 1 of 'jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_truncate' from incompatible pointer type >> fs/ocfs2/journal.h:451: warning: passing argument 2 of 'jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_truncate' makes integer from pointer without a cast >> fs/ocfs2/journal.h:451: error: too many arguments to function 'jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_truncate' >> CC [M] fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.o >> In file included from fs/ocfs2/aops.c:42: >> fs/ocfs2/journal.h: In function 'ocfs2_begin_ordered_truncate': >> fs/ocfs2/journal.h:451: warning: passing argument 1 of 'jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_truncate' from incompatible pointer type >> fs/ocfs2/journal.h:451: warning: passing argument 2 of 'jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_truncate' makes integer from pointer without a cast >> fs/ocfs2/journal.h:451: error: too many arguments to function 'jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_truncate' >> make[2]: *** [fs/ocfs2/aops.o] Error 1 >> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >> In file included from fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c:37: >> fs/ocfs2/journal.h: In function 'ocfs2_begin_ordered_truncate': >> fs/ocfs2/journal.h:451: warning: passing argument 1 of 'jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_truncate' from incompatible pointer type >> fs/ocfs2/journal.h:451: warning: passing argument 2 of 'jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_truncate' makes integer from pointer without a cast >> fs/ocfs2/journal.h:451: error: too many arguments to function 'jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_truncate' >> make[2]: *** [fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.o] Error 1 >> make[2]: *** [fs/ocfs2/alloc.o] Error 1 > > Did this show up in 2.6.28.7?
no.
> Odds are it's one of the jbd2 patches from Ted. Ted, any ideas?
-- ~Randy
| |