[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3]: xvmalloc memory allocator
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Nitin Gupta wrote:

> Slub allocator could not be used due to fragmentation issues:
> Data here shows kmalloc using ~43% more memory than TLSF and xvMalloc
> is showed ~2% more space efficiency than TLSF (due to smaller metadata).

Well this looks like the use of 2^n sizes of the kmalloc arrayse cause a
lot of wastage here. Creating slab caches that fit your needs may help?
Have you had a look at the SLOB approach?

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-03-17 17:49    [W:0.438 / U:1.440 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site