[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: VFS, NFS security bug? Should CAP_MKNOD and CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE be added to CAP_FS_MASK?
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 5:10 AM, Serge E. Hallyn <> wrote:
> Quoting J. Bruce Fields (
>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 03:53:34PM +0300, Igor Zhbanov wrote:
>> > Hello!
>> >
>> > It seems that CAP_MKNOD and CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE were forgotten to be
>> > added to CAP_FS_MASK_B0 in linux-2.6.x and to CAP_FS_MASK in
>> > linux-2.4.x. Both capabilities affects file system and can be
>> > considered file system capabilities.
>> Sounds right to me--I'd expect rootsquash to guarantee that new device
>> nodes can't be created from the network.  Cc'ing random people from the
>> git log for include/linux/capability.h in hopes they can help.
> Yeah it seems reasonable.  If it is, then does that mean that we
> also need CAP_SYS_ADMIN (to write selinux labels) and CAP_SETFCAP
> (to set file capabilities) as well?

If a change is made to CAP_FS_MASK, please do remember to CC, and linux-api@.



Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; Found a documentation bug?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-03-12 21:23    [W:0.125 / U:1.160 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site