Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:46:03 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86: Don't pretend that non-framepointer stack traces are reliable |
| |
* Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:
> >From f460ce92e09770691855b98a904556e92d39ead9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> > Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 12:20:20 -0800 > Subject: [PATCH] x86: Don't pretend that non-framepointer stack traces are reliable > > without frame pointers enabled, the x86 stack traces should not > pretend to be reliable; instead they should just be what they are: > unreliable. > > The effect of this is that they have a ? printed in the stacktrace, > to warn the reader that these entries are guesses rather than known > based on more reliable information. > > Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
applied to tip/x86/debug, thanks Arjan!
Ingo
| |