lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: state of some x86 acpi patches
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>
>>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>>>> yes, that end result is the desired state of things. We did run with
>>>> this for several months and resolved all the cases that needed fixing,
>>>> but dropped them when the ACPI tree moved out from under us.
>>>>
>>>> Can resurrect it if Len feels OK about the concept. Len, you shouldnt
>>>> worry about conflicts - we can do it after the ACPI changes of this
>>>> merge window are upstream so there should be no conflict trouble at
>>>> all. How does that sound?
>>>>
>>> Doesn't look like these changes made it in this time. Did they get
>>> overlooked, or did some other problem come up? Or did you want me to
>>> dig them up?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> J
>>>
>>
>>
>> please check attached that are updated to today tip/master with ingo's
>> genapic patchset..
>>
>
> The look OK, but they didn't get merged into tip/master?
>
Ingo is too busy...
It seems Len already agreed those patches can go through tip.

Ingo?

YH


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-02-07 04:29    [W:0.059 / U:0.292 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site