Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:49:17 +0000 | From | Russell King - ARM Linux <> | Subject | Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h |
| |
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 04:45:39PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 08:59:01PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > > > Jaswinder Singh Rajput (2): > > > Neither asm/types.h nor linux/types.h is required for arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h > > > make linux/types.h as assembly safe > > > > I continue to disagree with the need for the second patch. > > But have not replied to my mail about that so far.
Sigh. No I didn't - because I also got a reply from Jaswinder and covered all points in _that_ reply.
Would you like me to re-send my reply so that you can appear in the To: header?
Stop making this discussion stupidly obtuse.
| |