lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3][RFC] swsusp: shrink file cache first
Date
Hi

I have some comment.

> File cache pages are saved to disk either through normal writeback by
> reclaim or by including them in the suspend image written to a
> swapfile.
>
> Writing them either way should take the same amount of time but doing
> normal writeback and unmap changes the fault behaviour on resume from
> prefault to on-demand paging, smoothening out resume and giving
> previously cached pages the chance to stay out of memory completely if
> they are not used anymore.
>
> Another reason for preferring file page eviction is that the locality
> principle is visible in fault patterns and swap might perform really
> bad with subsequent faulting of contiguously mapped pages.
>
> Since anon and file pages now live on different lists, selectively
> scanning one type only is straight-forward.

I don't understand your point.
Which do you want to improve suspend performance or resume performance?

if we think suspend performance, we should consider swap device and file-backed device
are different block device.
the interleave of file-backed page out and swap out can improve total write out performce.

if we think resume performance, we shold how think the on-disk contenious of the swap consist
process's virtual address contenious.
it cause to reduce unnecessary seek.
but your patch doesn't this.

Could you explain this patch benefit?
and, I think you should mesure performence result.


<snip>


> @@ -2134,17 +2144,17 @@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned
>
> /*
> * We try to shrink LRUs in 5 passes:
> - * 0 = Reclaim from inactive_list only
> - * 1 = Reclaim from active list but don't reclaim mapped
> - * 2 = 2nd pass of type 1
> - * 3 = Reclaim mapped (normal reclaim)
> - * 4 = 2nd pass of type 3
> + * 0 = Reclaim unmapped inactive file pages
> + * 1 = Reclaim unmapped file pages

I think your patch reclaim mapped file at priority 0 and 1 too.


> + * 2 = Reclaim file and inactive anon pages
> + * 3 = Reclaim file and anon pages
> + * 4 = Second pass 3
> */
> for (pass = 0; pass < 5; pass++) {
> int prio;
>
> - /* Force reclaiming mapped pages in the passes #3 and #4 */
> - if (pass > 2)
> + /* Reclaim mapped pages in higher passes */
> + if (pass > 1)
> sc.may_swap = 1;

Why need this line?
If you reclaim only file backed lru, may_swap isn't effective.
So, Can't we just remove this line and always set may_swap=1 ?




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-02-06 04:41    [W:0.084 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site