Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:48:29 -0500 (EST) | From | Christoph Lameter <> | Subject | Re: [patch] SLQB slab allocator (try 2) |
| |
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Just to clarify on this last point, do you mean slub_max_order=0 to > > force order-0 allocations in SLUB? > > Hmm... I think slub_min_objects=1 should also do basically the same. > Actually slub_min_object=1 and slub_max_order=1 should get closest I > think.
slub_max_order=0 would be sufficient.
| |