lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 28 Feb 2009 01:46:05 -0800
FromJeremy Fitzhardinge <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] xen: core dom0 support
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Personally i'd like to see a sufficient reply to the mmap-perf
> paravirt regressions pointed out by Nick and reproduced by
> myself as well. (They were in the 4-5% macro-performance range
> iirc, which is huge.)
>
> So i havent seen any real progress on reducing native kernel
> overhead with paravirt. Patches were sent but no measurements
> were done and it seemed to have all fizzled out while the dom0
> patches are being pursued.
>

Hm, I'm not sure what you want me to do here. I sent out patches, they
got merged, I posted the results of my measurements showing that the
patches made a substantial improvement. I'd love to see confirmation
from others that the patches help them, but I don't think you can say
I've been unresponsive about this.

J


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-02-28 10:49    [from the cache]
©2003-2010