[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFD] Automatic suspend
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 03:22:39PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday 27 February 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Wakelocks done right are single atomic_t... and if you set it to 0,
> > you just unblock "sleeper" thread or something. Zero polling and very
> > simple...
> Except that you have to check all of the wakelocks periodically in a loop =>
> polling. So?

Why do you need to check them? If you're taking this approach you just
have something like:

suspend_unblock() {
if (atomc_dec_and_test(&suspend_lock))

and then check that the lock count is still 0 after device_suspend().
There's no need to poll.

Matthew Garrett |

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-02-27 15:33    [W:0.182 / U:8.316 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site