lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] make CALLER_ADDRx overwriteable
Hi,

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 04:32:45PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
> > -/* TODO: need to fix this for ARM */
> > -# define CALLER_ADDR0 ((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0))
> > -# define CALLER_ADDR1 ((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(1))
> > -# define CALLER_ADDR2 ((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(2))
> > -# define CALLER_ADDR3 ((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(3))
> > -# define CALLER_ADDR4 ((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(4))
> > -# define CALLER_ADDR5 ((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(5))
> > -# define CALLER_ADDR6 ((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(6))
> > -#else
> > -# define CALLER_ADDR0 ((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0))
> > -# define CALLER_ADDR1 0UL
> > -# define CALLER_ADDR2 0UL
> > -# define CALLER_ADDR3 0UL
> > -# define CALLER_ADDR4 0UL
> > -# define CALLER_ADDR5 0UL
> > -# define CALLER_ADDR6 0UL
> > -#endif
> > +#ifndef CALLER_ADDR0
>
> but I think this "#ifndef CALLER_ADDR0" don't explain developer intention at all.
> ARCH_HAS_XXXXX macro is better?
OK, this seems clearer. I'd use HAVE_ARCH_CALLER_ADDR though.

Best regards
Uwe

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-02-27 12:25    [W:0.094 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site