Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:51:36 +0300 | Subject | Re: [RFC] introduce pr_cont macro | From | Cyrill Gorcunov <> |
| |
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:28 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >> Btw., why do those macros use ##__VA_ARGS__ ? Why not a straightforward: >> >> #define __pr_cont(args...) \ >> printk(KERN_CONT args) >> > > Don't know if anyone cares, but __VA_ARGS__ is C99 whereas args... is a gcc > extension, AFAIK. > > -hpa >
I think in a sake of consistency better would be using __VA_ARGS__ here too (since all prevous pr_...'s use it).
| |