[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] tracing/ftrace: add missing wake-up on some callsites

On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> * Steven Rostedt <> wrote:
> > > Which would send a delayed work to wake up?
> >
> > No, I was thinking that trace_delay_wake_up() would be called
> > by these dangerous call sites. Then a per_cpu flag could be
> > set. We could have a trace point in the scheduler code that is
> > outside holding a runqueue lock, and this trace point would
> > call a trace function that will clear the per cpu flag, and
> > then call trace_wake_up().
> No, that's very roundabout and ugly. If we putting a tracepoint
> there we might as well put real scheduler code there that looks
> for such a flag. But i'm not convinced we need a flag ...

Just a suggestion. I was trying to keep the tracer from being an overhead.
But what else would you suggest? Just having the scheduler call

-- Steve

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-02-23 19:07    [W:0.046 / U:1.096 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site