Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:03:32 -0600 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] fs/cifs: send SMB_COM_FLUSH in cifs_fsync | From | Steve French <> |
| |
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Horst Reiterer <horst.reiterer@gmail.com> wrote: > In any case, it's probably a good idea to introduce a mount option. The > new behavior should be enabled by default though, to provide maximum data > consistency.
Suggestions on what to call such a new mount option? How about "nostrictfsync" ?
-- Thanks,
Steve
| |