Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:24:50 -0800 (PST) | Subject | Re: 2.6.28 headers break kbd and net-tools userspace builds | From | David Miller <> |
| |
From: Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:13:11 +0000
> What exactly is the purpose of the kernel headers? Are there some > definitions in the kernel headers that will never be available from > glibc? Is it perhaps possible to work towards exporting kernel > headers for the sole purpose of building glibc, and all other > packages should be able to build against glibc's headers?
To a certain extent they are supposed to be able to co-exist.
We weren't careful in the past in some cases, to the point where the conflicts often very difficult to resolve. That's the kind of situation we have here.
I guess I'll put in the following hack for now:
diff --git a/include/linux/if_tunnel.h b/include/linux/if_tunnel.h index aeab2cb..82c4362 100644 --- a/include/linux/if_tunnel.h +++ b/include/linux/if_tunnel.h @@ -2,7 +2,10 @@ #define _IF_TUNNEL_H_ #include <linux/types.h> + +#ifdef __KERNEL__ #include <linux/ip.h> +#endif #define SIOCGETTUNNEL (SIOCDEVPRIVATE + 0) #define SIOCADDTUNNEL (SIOCDEVPRIVATE + 1)
| |