lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [git-pull -tip] fix headers_check warnings
[H. Peter Anvin - Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 09:49:14AM -0800]
| Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
| >>
| >> Hi Jaswinder,
| >>
| >> it seems we have a clash here :) I thought this part
| >> was just dropped out
| >>
| >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/461
| >>
| >> and Peter had been applying it on tip:x86/header-fixes
| >>
| >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/549
| >>
| >> but maybe it's just lost...
| >
| > No, you cannot remove sys_arch_prctl otherwise you will get sparse
| > warning like this:
| >
| > CHECK arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
| > arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c:833:6: warning: symbol 'sys_arch_prctl' was not declared. Should it be static?
| >
|
| Perhaps we can just move this prototype to <asm/syscalls.h>.
|
| -hpa
|
| --
| H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
| I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
|

Hmm...

For internal use we refer to do_arch_prctl and
sys_arch_prctl supposed to be syscall wrapper.

Yes, Peter, you're right! It seems this call
was missed there.

-Cyrill-


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-02-02 18:55    [W:0.037 / U:0.748 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site