Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:47:50 +0100 | From | Stefan Richter <> | Subject | Re: [PATCHv2 00/11]Get rid of all the old macro DMA_nBIT_MASK and use DMA_BIT_MASK(n) instead |
| |
Yang Hongyang wrote: > v1->v2:fix s/micro/macro typo and keep the old defines > of DMA_nBIT_MASK > ---------------------- > Replace all DMA_nBIT_MASK macro with the new DMA_BIT_MASK(n) macro > > 01:Replace all DMA_64BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(64) > 02:Replace all DMA_48BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(48) > 03:Replace all DMA_40BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(40) > 04:Replace all DMA_39BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(39) > 05:Replace all DMA_35BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(35) > 06:Replace all DMA_32BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(32) > 07:Replace all DMA_31BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(31) > 08:Replace all DMA_30BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(30) > 09:Replace all DMA_28BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(28) > 10:Replace all DMA_24BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(24) > 11:Update the old macro DMA_nBIT_MASK related documentations >
Shouldn't you organize the patch series per subsystem, not per old macro? And then Cc the respective maintainers?
As it stands, the patches cannot be routed through the normal channels; yet there is no fundamental reason to handle these patches differently from normal patches. -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--= --=- =--== http://arcgraph.de/sr/
| |