lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCHv2 00/11]Get rid of all the old macro DMA_nBIT_MASK and use DMA_BIT_MASK(n) instead
Yang Hongyang wrote:
> v1->v2:fix s/micro/macro typo and keep the old defines
> of DMA_nBIT_MASK
> ----------------------
> Replace all DMA_nBIT_MASK macro with the new DMA_BIT_MASK(n) macro
>
> 01:Replace all DMA_64BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(64)
> 02:Replace all DMA_48BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(48)
> 03:Replace all DMA_40BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(40)
> 04:Replace all DMA_39BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(39)
> 05:Replace all DMA_35BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(35)
> 06:Replace all DMA_32BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(32)
> 07:Replace all DMA_31BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(31)
> 08:Replace all DMA_30BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(30)
> 09:Replace all DMA_28BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(28)
> 10:Replace all DMA_24BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(24)
> 11:Update the old macro DMA_nBIT_MASK related documentations
>

Shouldn't you organize the patch series per subsystem, not per old
macro? And then Cc the respective maintainers?

As it stands, the patches cannot be routed through the normal channels;
yet there is no fundamental reason to handle these patches differently
from normal patches.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--= --=- =--==
http://arcgraph.de/sr/


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-02-19 13:51    [W:0.108 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site