Messages in this thread | | | From | Jesse Barnes <> | Subject | Re: ACPI hotplug panic with current git head | Date | Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:59:26 -0800 |
| |
On Monday, February 16, 2009 9:10 pm Kenji Kaneshige wrote: > Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 28, 2009 3:47 am Kenji Kaneshige wrote: > >> I made several patches to fix the wrong assumption described > >> above. It is very difficult for me to check all the code that > >> refers pci_bus->self. So I checked include/linux/pci-acpi.h and > >> the code under drivers/pci/ only. And I made patches for the code > >> like below: > >> > >> - The code that clearly chooses host bridge operation or > >> PCI-to-PCI bridge operation based on pci_bus->self. > >> > >> - The code that might cause endless loop if pci_bus->self is > >> not NULL on the PCI root bus. > > > > Kenji-san, can you re-send these to my private mail so I can apply them? > > (Outlook/Exchange can't let plain text through without molesting it for > > some reason.) > > > > Thanks, > > Sure. Resending the following patches. I made those patches against > 2.6.29-rc2. I've confirmed they can be applied to 2.6.29-rc5. > > - [PATCH 1/8] PCI/ACPI: fix wrong assumption in acpi_pci_get_bridge_handle > - [PATCH 2/8] PCI/ACPI: fix wrong assumption in > acpi_find_root_bridge_handle - [PATCH 3/8] PCI hotplug: fix wrong > assumption in acpi_get_hp_params_from_firmware - [PATCH 4/8] PCI hotplug: > fix wrong assumption in acpi_get_hp_hw_control_from_firmware - [PATCH 5/8] > PCI: fix wrong assumption in pci_find_upstream_pcie_bridge - [PATCH 6/8] > PCI: fix wrong assumption in pci_read_bridge_bases > - [PATCH 7/8] PCI: fix wrong assumption in pci_get_interrupt_pin > - [PATCH 8/8] PCI: fix wrong assumption in pci_common_swizzle
James have you tested this set? I didn't see your tested-by in the changelogs... Just want to make sure if I'm going to send these to Linus for 2.6.29.
Thanks, -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
| |