[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch] SLQB slab allocator (try 2)
    On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:

    > Btw, Yanmin, do you have access to the tests Mel is running (especially the
    > ones where slub-rvrt seems to do worse)? Can you see this kind of regression?
    > The results make we wonder whether we should avoid reverting all of the page
    > allocator pass-through and just add a kmalloc cache for 8K allocations. Or not
    > address the netperf regression at all. Double-hmm.

    Going to 8k for the limit beyond we pass through to the page allocator may
    be the simplest and best solution. Someone please work on the page

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-02-18 12:23    [W:0.020 / U:12.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site