lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] drivers/net/sfc: fix sparse warnings: Should it be static?
Date
Impact: Include the header file.  If CONFIG_SFC_MTD is not defined
then the functions 'efx_mtd_remove' and 'efx_mtd_rename' are defined
'static inline' with an empty function body in the header file, but
the the whole file mtd.c is not built in this case.

Fix this sparse warnings:
drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c:204:6: warning: symbol 'efx_mtd_remove' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c:221:6: warning: symbol 'efx_mtd_rename' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c:230:5: warning: symbol 'efx_mtd_probe' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Hannes Eder <hannes@hanneseder.net>
---
drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c b/drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c
index 665cafb..820c233 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#define EFX_DRIVER_NAME "sfc_mtd"
#include "net_driver.h"
#include "spi.h"
+#include "efx.h"

#define EFX_SPI_VERIFY_BUF_LEN 16



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-02-18 12:23    [W:0.115 / U:0.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site