This message generated a parse failure. Raw output follows here. Please use 'back' to navigate. From devnull@lkml.org Fri Apr 26 20:54:42 2024 Delivery-date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:40:38 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751788AbZBPXkL (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:40:11 -0500 Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:48681 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750727AbZBPXkK (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:40:10 -0500 Received: from tytso authenticated as tytso by thunker.thunk.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1LZD4J-0005qZ-PY; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:40:07 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:01:04 -0500 From: Theodore Tso To: stable@kernel.org Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [cebbert@redhat.com: Re: Ext4 tree backports for 2.6.27.13 and 2.6.28.2] Message-Id: <20090216230104.GG23758@mini-me.lan> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Tso , stable@kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-Id: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi, Can you please include the patches found in the for-stable and for-stable-2.6.27 branches at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git into the next 2.6.28.y and 2.6.27.y kernels, respectively? Or do you need me to send them in e-mail format via git format-patch/git send-email? I can do that too if you prefer that. - Ted --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: Received: from po14.mit.edu ([unix socket]) by po14.mit.edu (Cyrus v2.1.5) with LMTP; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:37:49 -0500 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Received: from fort-point-station.mit.edu by po14.mit.edu (8.13.6/4.7) id n1GLbmDm014461; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:37:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from mit.edu (M24-004-BARRACUDA-1.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.111]) by fort-point-station.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.9.2) with ESMTP id n1GLbhLi004836 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:37:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [66.187.237.31]) by mit.edu (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 33E14D647FE for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:37:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1GLbe2q016841; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:37:40 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n1GLbeWP020811; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:37:40 -0500 Received: from dhcp-100-2-144.bos.redhat.com (dhcp-100-2-144.bos.redhat.com [10.16.2.144]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1GLbdYC016657; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:37:39 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:35:07 -0500 From: Chuck Ebbert To: Theodore Tso Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Ext4 tree backports for 2.6.27.13 and 2.6.28.2 Message-ID: <20090216163507.1e73f452@dhcp-100-2-144.bos.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20090212211935.GE6922@mini-me.lan> References: <20090211075914.GC20842@skywalker> <20090211153328.37ef255f@dhcp-100-2-144.bos.redhat.com> <20090212211935.GE6922@mini-me.lan> Organization: Red Hat, Inc. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.27.26 X-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Spam-Flag: NO On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:19:35 -0500 Theodore Tso wrote: > > I've updated the for-stable and for-stable-2.6.27 branches against the > latest stable releases, and I've updated the two flawed backports in > the for-stable-2.6.27 branch. Could you do a quick double-check and > make sure the fixes are as you expect, before I send a pull request to > stable@kernel.org? The 2.6.27 branch looks good to me. --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/