Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:48:12 +0000 (GMT) | From | Hugh Dickins <> | Subject | Re: [Bug #12609] v2.6.29-rc2 libata sff 32bit PIO regression |
| |
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Larry Finger wrote: > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12609 > > > Subject : v2.6.29-rc2 libata sff 32bit PIO regression > > > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> > > > Date : 2009-01-23 23:52 (23 days old) > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123275478111406&w=4 > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123254501314058&w=4 > > > Handled-By : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> > > > Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> > > > Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> > > > Patch : > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123412278730735&w=4 > > > > This problem is not fixed as of 2.6.29-rc5. > > Sergei, what is the latest version of your patch? According to my notes, you > and Hugh were going back and forth trading patches, and I never saw a final > version...
I was happy with the patch Sergei posted a week ago, and said so - except for the question of whether to say "unlikely(slop)": and that's a very silly little issue which should never have delayed fixing a significant regression, I'm sorry I ever raised it.
But I was expecting Alan to gather the fixes together and send them to you: on 26 Jan he posted two other patches, one perhaps just a cleanup, but the other he said required for correct behaviour on AMD devices: I thought all three patches would be in by now.
Hugh
| |