[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RESEND/PATCH] ext[234]: Return -EIO not -ESTALE on directory traversal missing inode
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:53:48PM -0500, Bryan Donlan wrote:
> > I'm dubious about unlikely() here; OTOH, penalizing the error case
> > seems reasonable.
> I can leave it without the unlikely(), as it was before, but as far as
> I can tell, this should never happen under a non-corrupted, non-broken
> hardware filesystem, so it seems like a reasonable annotation to me.

You're right. I was looking at the wrong place in the source, and
thought this could happen if the lookup failed; but yes, you're right,
this case can only happen if the filesystem is corrupted or there is
an I/O error.

- Ted

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-02-15 06:43    [W:0.133 / U:3.144 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site