Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:46:24 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [patch] rt: res_counter fix, v2 |
| |
* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 15:28 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > [ 45.228589] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff8025449d>] copy_process+0x68d/0x1500 > > > [ 45.228602] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff8025449d>] copy_process+0x68d/0x1500 > > > > > > The reason for which I wanted to send an irqsoff trace is that the above lines are false. > > copy_process() has: > > #endif > p->hardirq_enable_ip = 0; > p->hardirq_enable_event = 0; > p->hardirq_disable_ip = _THIS_IP_; > p->hardirq_disable_event = 0; > p->softirqs_enabled = 1; > p->softirq_enable_ip = _THIS_IP_; > p->softirq_enable_event = 0; > p->softirq_disable_ip = 0; > p->softirq_disable_event = 0; > p->hardirq_context = 0; > p->softirq_context = 0; > #endif > > the sequence count of 0 basically tells you it hasn't been set yet.
maybe we should initialize it to -1 to make this more apparent?
Ingo
| |