Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 9 Feb 2009 00:49:46 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: [PATCHv2] lis3lv02d: support both one- and two-byte sensors |
| |
On Wed 2009-02-11 01:21:32, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: > [removed git from the cc because that was a mistake] > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Éric Piel <Eric.Piel@tremplin-utc.net> wrote: > > BTW, now that this is working. Could you double check the correct axes set > > up. In particular, is it x_inverted or y_inverted, and what about z axis... > > Now that we have the 8 vs 16 bit mess sorted out, I re-checked and > there my sensor definitely has the X (first) axis inverted, so the > one-liner patch I sent at the beginning is still valid, at least as > far as my laptop is involved. It might be that different dv5 Pavilions > have different sensors though, which will make it quite harder to sort > out. > > I'd be interested in hearing from the other user (the one reporting > inverted Y): rather than checking neverball, could he use plain jstest > and see if the results match the Documentation or not?
Actuall 'watch cat position' is simplest way to test it. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |