Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 7 Dec 2009 05:02:57 +0100 | From | Frederic Weisbecker <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] Does raw_field_ptr() supports __data_loc? |
| |
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 12:34:43PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote: > VERY very sorry for my long silence... > > Please don't commit this patch, Ingo. > This patch is required to test the next patch for perf lock. > > I have a question for Steven Rostedt and Tom Zanussi. > Does current raw_field_ptr() support __data_loc? > > At 064739bc4b3d7f424b2f25547e6611bcf0132415 , > support for the modifier "__data_loc" of format is added.
I guess this patch handled the nature of the strings, but the current end use is in perl. There is no support of it in raw_field_ptr().
Your patch looks good to me..
| |