Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:21:34 -0500 | | From | Rik van Riel <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/9] ksm: let shared pages be swappable |
| |
On 12/04/2009 09:45 AM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> I think it's fishy to ignore the page_referenced retval and I don't > like the wipe_page_referenced concept. page_referenced should only be > called when we're in presence of VM pressure that requires > unmapping. And we should always re-add the page to active list head, > if it was found referenced as retval of page_referenced.
You are wrong here, for scalability reasons I explained to you half a dozen times before :)
I agree with the rest of your email, though.
-- All rights reversed.
|  |