lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 2/4] reiserfs: Warn on lock relax if taken recursively
Date
When we relax the reiserfs lock to avoid creating unwanted
dependencies against others locks while grabbing these,
we want to ensure it has not been taken recursively, otherwise
the lock won't be really relaxed. Only its depth will be decreased.
The unwanted dependency would then actually happen.

To prevent from that, add a reiserfs_lock_check_recursive() call
in the places that need it.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
fs/reiserfs/lock.c | 9 +++++++++
include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h | 9 +++++++++
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/lock.c b/fs/reiserfs/lock.c
index ee2cfc0..b87aa2c 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/lock.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/lock.c
@@ -86,3 +86,12 @@ void reiserfs_check_lock_depth(struct super_block *sb, char *caller)
reiserfs_panic(sb, "%s called without kernel lock held %d",
caller);
}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK
+void reiserfs_lock_check_recursive(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+ struct reiserfs_sb_info *sb_i = REISERFS_SB(sb);
+
+ WARN_ONCE((sb_i->lock_depth > 0), "Unwanted recursive reiserfs lock!\n");
+}
+#endif
diff --git a/include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h b/include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h
index 35d3f45..793bf83 100644
--- a/include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h
@@ -62,6 +62,12 @@ void reiserfs_write_unlock(struct super_block *s);
int reiserfs_write_lock_once(struct super_block *s);
void reiserfs_write_unlock_once(struct super_block *s, int lock_depth);

+#ifdef CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK
+void reiserfs_lock_check_recursive(struct super_block *s);
+#else
+static inline void reiserfs_lock_check_recursive(struct super_block *s) { }
+#endif
+
/*
* Several mutexes depend on the write lock.
* However sometimes we want to relax the write lock while we hold
@@ -92,6 +98,7 @@ void reiserfs_write_unlock_once(struct super_block *s, int lock_depth);
static inline void reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe(struct mutex *m,
struct super_block *s)
{
+ reiserfs_lock_check_recursive(s);
reiserfs_write_unlock(s);
mutex_lock(m);
reiserfs_write_lock(s);
@@ -101,6 +108,7 @@ static inline void
reiserfs_mutex_lock_nested_safe(struct mutex *m, unsigned int subclass,
struct super_block *s)
{
+ reiserfs_lock_check_recursive(s);
reiserfs_write_unlock(s);
mutex_lock_nested(m, subclass);
reiserfs_write_lock(s);
@@ -109,6 +117,7 @@ reiserfs_mutex_lock_nested_safe(struct mutex *m, unsigned int subclass,
static inline void
reiserfs_down_read_safe(struct rw_semaphore *sem, struct super_block *s)
{
+ reiserfs_lock_check_recursive(s);
reiserfs_write_unlock(s);
down_read(sem);
reiserfs_write_lock(s);
--
1.6.2.3


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-30 06:23    [W:0.104 / U:0.328 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site